Stephen Gill's Immigrant :
A Study In Diasporic Consciousness
Nilofar Akhtar
The phenomena of Diaspora and expatriation are by all
means an old one. However, its impact in
the present times is larger and deeper.
It has become a contemporary social trait and also, a literary
genre. The growing incidence of the
Diaspora has given place to dislocation, disintegration, dispossession and disbelongingness.
The experience of expatriation not only gradually disconnects the
individual from his roots, simultaneously it polarises
his existence, which straddles between nationality and exile.
Here, at the onset it will only be apt to bring into
light the historical significance of the Diaspora. All serious study of diaspora
traces its history way back with ethnic Jewish model of diaspora. However, the term is widely used now for all
the activities of expatriation, which lead to emotional and physical
displacement. The modern Indian Diaspora
began in the later half of the nineteenth century and counts for the bigwigs
like Salman Rushdie and V.S.Naipaul.
Stephen Gill is an
Diaspora, therefore is an emotional and psychological state of
(a) strutting between two geographical and cultural states (b) struggling
between regression and progression, dislocation and then, relocation. This
continuum of perpetual shift between two states of dislocation and relocation
makes one interrogate the sustainability of an individual in such a situation.
Diaspora relates to History and culture and this experience of inhabiting two
history specific and culture specific spaces yields to subtle tension of
dislocation and alienation. The strategy
that accounts for such cultural shock of a migrant as that he tries to
construct multiple identity and develops a hybrid
vision, which eventually becomes an ongoing process for adaptation.
In an essay published in the 80's, Salman Rushdie has brought out the agony and the ecstasy of
being an expatriate:
Exiles or immigrants or expatriates are haunted by
some sense of loss, some urge to reclaim, to look back, even at the risk of
being mutated into pillars of salt. 1
He shares his own diasporic experience, thus:
But if we do look back, we must also do so, in the
profound knowledge - which gives rise to profound uncertainties - that our
physical alienation from India almost inevitably means that we will not be
capable of reclaiming precisely the thing that was lost; that we will, in
short, create fictions not actual cities or villages, but invisible ones,
imaginary homelands, Indias of the mind. 2
Stephen Gill has depicted, in his novel, this hybridity of the 'immigrant' who is strutting across two
spaces - geographical and cultural. He
is looking forward towards the country of his settlement for acceptance and
involvement and simultaneously, yearning for his 'imaginary homeland'. With a
backward glance, he moves on. Reghu Nath, the immigrant lives
in
His past experience as an Indian and his present
status as a Canadian bring him close to socioeconomic and political
contradictions. He understands the
strategy of cultural sharing vis
a vis survival in a new environment. As a highly qualified Indian, he finds himself
unable to get a good job in
Reghu grew more and more restless and
worried with the passage of time. The
more he considered the future and his security, the more nervous he
became. He hated the idea of being a
parasite on society by living on welfare.
The way it was handled was humiliating and disdainful. Even the man at the welfare office behaved as
if he were doling out money to robbers under sheer compulsion. There seemed no mutual respect and understanding
between the recipients and the office staff. 3
Reghu Nath becomes a victim of such socio-economic and political
contradictions which give rise to (a) either marginalisation
of cultures or, (b) cross cultural communication (which is a milder expression
of submission). An immigrant is
constantly in pulls and pressures and suffers a marginalized existence as he
carries with himself, the 'cultural baggage' of his ' homeland’, which exists
only in the figment of his imagination.
What I am attempting to formulate in this
essay are the Diaspora sensibilities of an Indian student in
Reghu knew that he spoke English with an
accent. Whenever he thought of it, he felt ashamed, considering the time he had spent on
his studying in
As
an immigrant, Reghu is caught between identity crisis
and cross-cultural communication and as a consequence develops a double vision,
a hybrid glance to combat such a marginalized existence. Salman Rushdie, in
his essay 'Imaginary Homelands' has reflected on this issue, thus
:
Our identity is at once plural and partial. Sometimes we feel we straddle two cultures;
at other times, that we fall between two stools ... But however ambiguous and
shifting this ground may be it is not an infertile territory for a writer to
occupy. If literature is in part the business of finding new angles at which to
enter reality, then once again our distance, our long geographical perspective,
may provide us with such angles. 5
Thus, an immigrant 'falls between two stools' and
perceives actions, events and experience in a relative light. This openness of perception and double vision
comes as a by-product of diaspora and helps an
expatriate to make the recognition that the world is an open platform where
different interpretation of one action / event / experience may be
possible. Gill sees the predicament of Reghu from political angle, too and apprehends Canadians'
policy of exclusion as a desperate bid to tarnish the image of
Reghu was
driven to thinking about his own country, where he had held a good position
before coming to
An immigrant draws on two distinct
cultural modes and is caught between two sets of ideologies - walking across
two terrains, dwelling much on either side and in the attempt disrupting long
established epistemological notions.
Thus, Reghu Nath
ruminates over socio political issues of
The thing about
Reghu's opting for
A diasporic
writer as the global trotter operates from out side
Reghu is conscious of his diasporic existence which means that he suffers from
dislocation, dispossession, alienation, hybridity and
above all dissatisfaction on 'not belonging to' the new country. "Unbelongingness' in made a virtue, a celebration of his diasporic existence and he accepts it in order to survive
in the center margin construct which is constituted on the binary notions of
master / slave, imperial / colonial, coloured /
white, we / the other.
Then, the issue of identity forms the
core of the diasporic consciousness Reghu meets ill treatment and racial slurs at the hands of
the Canadian. The moment one becomes an
expatriate, he needs to define himself as the new environment compels him to do
so. In this attempt of self definition
one may either assimilate his identity with his host country thereby severing
all ties with his native country, or he may resume his Indianness
and see the people around as 'the other', cultural assimilation and cultural
alienation are the two extremes within which an expatriate tries to adjust
himself to Reghu depicts such confusion of life and
living, declining values, loss of compassion and trust and submits to his new
environment by adopting the strategy of "excessive belonging". He concludes that human beings were basically
alike everywhere.
Men and women all over the world are the same
basically. These so called cultures are
man made and cause confusion and anarchy.
A university bred girl from
He uses this strategy of excessive belonging
in order to gain ground in a new milieu and interrogates the concept of nation
and nationality. For an expatriate, ‘home’ is a recurrent theme as Indians are
more attached to its concept. In Reghu’s case, living abroad for long, he suffers a break up
with family and loses a sense of protection which it provides. Neither can he go back for he is short of
money. Between home and exile, there is
a tight rope walking for him which make him revert to
the strategy of “excessive belongingness”. With globalization, more and more
people are moving from one part of the world to another. They now prefer ‘to gravel’ than to ‘be
home’. Like Reghu,
people are leaving their secured home for ‘the journey outward’. Disillusioned, they might be but are least
willing to go back. Reghu understands such
contemporary cosmopolitan trend of dislocation where ‘centrality’ and
‘marginality’ have blurred and overlapped each other. He is against any kind of center be it
colonial or national and favours ‘decentering’
much like his narrator. Dismissive
towards the concept of culture, nation and nationality, ‘the immigrant’
advocates the formation of new cultural configurations, which may help in the
assimilation, and understanding of divergent groups and societies.
References
1.
Salman
Rushdie, “The Indian Writer in
2.
Ibid., 83.
3.
Stephen Gill, Immigrant (Ontario: Vesta,
1982), p.
79.
4.
Ibid., p. 19.
5.
Salman Rushdie,
“Imaginary Homelands”,
6.
Stephen Gill, Immigrant,
p. 33.
7.
Ibid., p. 34.
8.
Ibid. ,p. 66.
This paper is to be included in Dr. Nilanshu Kumar Agarwal’s
forthcoming book Discovering Stephen Gill: A Collection of Papers and
Articles.
Nilofar Akhtar
is a lecturer in English at Govt. P.G. College in Champawat,
Uttarakhand, India