PACIFISM IN STEPHEN GILL’S POETRY

                                               

Dr. Brahma Dutta Sharma

                                               

 

In his poetry Stephen Gill appears  as a pacifist and  a champion of peace and harmony. In a number of his poems, such as  ‘Talking of Peace’, ‘Light of Truth’, ‘Divided Humanity’, ‘About War’, ‘The Gulf Crisis on TV’, ‘A Familiar Scene’, ‘If There Be a Third World war’, ‘Prayer for the Coming Years’, and  ‘To Be’ he describes wars as occurrences causing destruction and peace and harmony as the bringers of happiness, growth and construction. He explicitly says that a war is an undesirable occurrence. For example, in his poem ’Prayer for the Coming Years’ he  says that he wishes to weed out war:

 

Strengthen me with thy Manna

to weed out

the war

the misery

and the hard days of the past

and to help

good to emerge

in the coming years.    (Divergent Shades, 9)

 

       The poet’s wishes to have a future which is free from wars, and misery. He regards warfare as an undesirable phenomenon. He associates peace with construction and wars with destruction. For instance, in his poem ‘Hounds of War’ he writes:

 

When

the hounds of war

ravage

the luxuriant pastures of prosperity

melodies of the dove slumber

under the foliage of the rainbow

of discontent.    (Shrine 56)                 

 

       He is asserting in this poem that wars bring harmony to its end, kill melodies and prevent people from realizing their dreams. When he says: The dove pleads / that the dance of the hounds/ be stopped/ to let her pacifying carol /fortify human muscles/ to build more Taj Mahals and pyramids of justice. (Shrine 56), he suggests that human muscles can make justice have its sway only when there is peace.    

       In his poem ‘War Fever’  Gill lists some of the losses that war causes to humans  and their surroundings:

 

War fever

poisons the air of surroundings

disturbs the calm of sea

crumbles human relations

kills the appetite of the soul

weakens the liver of love,

turning everything upside down.  (Shrine 49)

 

       According to Stephen Gill, a war turns everything upside down because  it pollutes the air of the surroundings, disturbs the calm of seas, weakens the feelings of love, spiritualism and friendship.

            Gill repeatedly states in his poems that war causes mass killings. For instance, in his poem ‘Trilliums’ he defines war as an act of slaughtering: War: / to buy blossom of a mother/ for slaughtering of another. (Songs for Harmony 56). In his poem ‘About War  he writes: War creates more widows/ renders infants fatherless/ sets homes in darkness/ and loses human affection   (Songs for Harmony- 22).

       He draws his readers’ attention to the other harms that wars cause.  He elaborates them in  the same poem:

 

War pollutes the air

making life very hard

it produces untold terrors

and stocks tearing tensions.    (Songs for Harmony 22)

 

       If one is sensitive to human misery one must feel pity for a woman who has become a widow whether she belongs to our country or to that of our enemy. Likewise, a boy who has lost his father has been deprived of the care one gets from one’s father, with the result that he has been rendered pathetic. A human child needs care for a long time and unless proper care, including education, is made available to him, he remains deprived of an opportunity to develop his talents properly. When the poet says: “War pollutes the air” (see supra), he draws the readers’ attention to another problem.  The air we breathe in is highly polluted and it needs efforts to control the level of pollution. Since wars increase pollution, they should not be allowed to occur. The fourth problem to which the poet draws our attention is that wars make life hard as it causes a lot of destruction and deprives people of what they have created to make life less hard. Since it is in the interest of the survival of human race, life should be made as easy as possible. What makes life hard must be looked upon with askance. When the poet says that a war “produces untold terrors” (see supra), he is drawing attention to the fact that during the days of war nothing is safe and  any city, any man and any building may be targeted any time. It is still fresh in the memory of mankind that during the Second World War,  Hiroshima and Nagasaki had been targeted by the U.S.A. and the World Trade Centre of the U.S.A. was targeted by the terrorists of the Middle-East on the 11th of September 2001. When the poet says that  a war “stocks tearing tensions” (see supra), he is drawing attention to the fact that  one can be targeted any moment, one cannot be at ease and will find oneself full of tensions most of the time.

            In a number of his poems Gill gives pen-pictures of the victims of fighting and brings into focus the damages which the wars cause. For example, his poem ‘The Gulf Crisis on TV’ is replete with such pen-pictures:

 

Women crying

around debris

men hurling abuses

children confused and despaired

the Patriots intercepting the Scuds

the showers of bullets

downing the planes, and

the bombs piercing things, homes …. (Shrine 55)

 

       The pictures of women crying around broken buildings, men expressing their rage against an aggression,  and children not be able to understand what is happening are indications of the havoc that a war causes. A parallel settings have been painted in ‘A Familiar Scene’ in which the bodies of slain soldiers and the other victims of war are lying discarded in garbage and rolling in ditches as there is none to perform their last rites:

 

Bodies rolling in ditches

or dumped with the garbage.

Bodies washing up

on to the beaches

like bundles of clothes

or lying discarded

in open mass graves

heaped together

in grotesque piles. (Shrine 68)

 

       It is immensely pitiable that the bodies of the soldiers who have died for their country have been left uncared for. Gill does not remain contended with this,  but goes to say that when these people were alive they had their dreams, aspirations and visions. They were not inanimate or thoughtless. Their dreams and aspirations have also died with them: In half-shut eyes / Their dreams are now stones, / Bodies wrapped with red /Lie in the lap of dust.(Shrine  69)

             It is the dreams of people that make them work to make shining achievements in life. For example, Milton had a dream that he would leave behind him a poetical work of such merit that people “will not let it willingly die”. He realized this dream  when he wrote his epic Paradise Lost.

            Gill writes in the same  poem ‘A Familiar Scene’:

Here is a mother

who moves the corpses

to find her son;

here is the cry of an old man

buried in the cries of the wounded.     (Shrine 69)

 

       It has been suggested that wars make  the dependents of the victims  helpless because they are left without a bread-earner and therefore dependents   have to lead a life of deprivation. The sight of a mother trying to identify the body of her son among the corpses lying uncared for and an old man crying for his son are pathetic.

            Gill does not keep himself confined to the sufferings of unidentified people only. He  writes also about people who have been identified. For instance, in  ‘Somali Victim of 1992 Tribal Warfare’ he narrates the story of a boy who is admitted to a hospital. He illustrates  the condition of the boy in the following words:

 

he has not eaten for days

it may be his rapacity

for the food of the village

or because he gave up hope.

Life has not yet crept back

into his sight.

He may not remember 

his days at home

because of fever

and constant headaches.  (Shrine  73)

 

       This boy  is a victim of the tribal warfare: When / the tribal smoke of animosity / overshadowed the smiling landscapes / of Somalia/ his father lost everything (Shrine). In the following lines, there is a suggestion that the boy is not likely to survive:

The nurse says

swollen limbs mean

the case is desperate.

A famished body

eats its own fat

and finally protein for energy.

Muscles weaken,

Weakening the heart.  (Shrine  75)

 

       This is tantamount to saying that what happens during warfare may uproot families, may cause them financial losses, and may even wipe them out from the face of the earth.  Gill adds further: Around him lay / emaciated, rag-clothed kids./ Some have swollen bellies / and some sores on their heads, / hands or feet. (Shrine  74).  It is obvious that this boy is not the only victim of war. There are several  who share his fate.

                  Gill shows the effects of warfare also on cities. For example in ‘Bride is Watching’ he illustrates how a war converts  Karachi, once a bride-like city, into a slaughter-house:

 

Her lap has become

a slaughtering spot

with the swords

that had sheltered her home.  (Divergent shade 43)

           

        Stephen Gill rejects the assertions of the people who idealize  war, because it gives the victor a glory, it is fought for the progress of the nation, it ends a misrule, it stops corruption, or it settles disputes. In ‘About War’ he says:

 

Don’t tell me

war is a winning glory

it is to defend the land

and stop regression.

 

Don’t tell me

war is boosting pride

it is to end misrule

and to stop corruption. (Songs for Harmony 21)

           

       If wars are that bad, war-mongers must be regarded as the tools of the forces of evil rather than those of the forces of light. That is the reason why Gill describes war-mongers as the persons getting sustenance from the land of darkness. He says in  ‘Light of Truth’:

 

War-mongers are drinking

from the land of darkness.

The land of devils is empty

because its occupants

extend desert of savagery…(Divergent shade 47)

 

       Akin to them are the arms traders whom Gill regards as insane when he says:

Sleeping in the web of greed

arms traders forget the dove

hidden in the caves of blood.

Appearing in the stage of the future

the coming generations will go insane

thinking of their insanity.        (Shrine 50)

 

         In his poem ‘Reptiles’, Gill tries to identify the feelings which are inimical to peace and harmony. He asserts that they are fanaticism and racism: : “ … a fanatic reptile/ …hides among the shrubs/ where the flowers of peace / cannot bloom”     ( Songs for Harmony  47).  He calls the dungeons of racism cold and loveless when he says: “In those sunless lands --/ Cold dungeons of racism --/ birds cannot fly” (Songs for Harmony  47). Even in his poem ‘Evening of Harmony’,  he regards racial prejudices as the enemies of peace. He says: “… the night of racial prejudice/ chews peace/ in the jaws of endless depth” (Songs for Harmony 48)

             Gill wants pacifism to be accepted as a principle when he draws his readers’ attention to the fact that if there is one more World War, it may cause the annihilation of the whole mankind. He describes it in his poem ‘If There Be a Third World War’ in which he writes:

 

If another war breaks out

no one may survive

to watch white front of the moon

that is often so fascinating

and to sit in pleasant warmth

of the sunshine…..

 

seasons may come and go

but no singer to glorify them. (Songs of Harmony 23)

           

        The onus of establishing peace in the world, according to Gill, is not only on  rulers but also on leaders, statesmen and even on ordinary citizens. He expresses this opinion in his poem ‘Talking of Peace’. Here he reminds the people of  these categories of what they have been doing to damage the cause of peace. He finds it hypocritical on the part of rulers to talk of peace when they have armed their countries with nuclear  weapons to the teeth.  He laments:

 

Our rulers talk of peace

but it is futile

when nuclear-powered marines

sail over breasts of the oceans;

missiles look down

and neutrons

make fun of every life.            (Shrine 46)

 

       The implication is that rulers can be sincere in their efforts for peace only when  they adopt disarmament as a matter of policy. Gill expects politicians, in case they are sincere in their efforts for peace, to enable citizens not to be intimidated by murderers as he says in this poem ‘Talking for Peace’:

 

Our politicians want peace

but it cannot be achieved

as long as citizens are locked

in the prison of their fears;

their daily bread,

doled out by murderers,

and love worshipped

with bullets.     (Shrine 46)

 

        Gill wants leaders to free people from tensions of human relations, to remove their ignorance, and to see that their basic needs are gratified as he writes:

 

Our leaders

envision peace

but it can never be real

if homes are destroyed

by tensions of human relations;

the arteries of ignorance

continue hardening

and the merciless locusts

of the basic needs

keep buzzing

over individuals and lands.   (Shrine 47)

 

      The implication of the statement is that real peace can be attained only when family life is free from tensions, people are no more ignorant and their basic needs are gratified. He may be saying so in view of the fact that if the inhabitants of a country  find it difficult to gratify their needs, they tend to attack  other countries. Gill expects also common citizens  to work for peace. He expects them to shorten the arms of darkness, to reduce the heaps of arsenal and to get rid of pollution. This is what he means in this poem:

 

Our citizens

crave peace

but it shall remain a dream

because

the arms of darkness grown longer;

the crop of the arsenal is raised

and the demons of pollution

stand tormenting us.       (Shrine 47)

 

       Gill also wants criminals to be punished and autocrats  be stopped from dominating citizens:

 

Everyone

discusses peace

but it leads nowhere

when there is no accounting

of criminals;

and the subjects are dominated

by the cruelty of the autocrats.   (Shrine 48)

 

        No doubt, disarmament can free the world from the fear of an armed war, but no single country can be expected to disarm itself as nobody can assure it that it shall never be attacked. Poet  is right when he shows how wars cause deaths and destruction but there remains the question as to what a victim of wrongs should do in order to stop the hand of the wrong-doer, in case he resolves not to fight. Gill should have made a distinction between a war  to rob and a war  to escape from being robbed. The second kind of war cannot be regarded as unjustifiable. There have been thinkers who have rejected the use of weapons to achieve one’s end , but they have offered alternatives.  For example, Thoreau offered the path of passive resistance as an alternative to an armed resistance. Mahatma Gandhi resorted to the use of non-cooperation in his fight against the British rulers of India in the pre-Independence days. But Stephen Gill does not suggest any alternative to an armed struggle against injustice and tyranny. Nor does Gill takes up the question as to what victims of racism and fanaticism should do to stop racists from  oppressing them.

 

SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY

  1. Primary Sources

Gill, Stephen. Divergent Shades. Ranchi  (India): Writers’ Workshop, n.d.

10…sharma-gill

 

---------------  Shrine: Poems of Social Concern. Benson: World University Press, 1999.

--------------  Songs for Harmony. Cornwall: Vesta Publications, 1992

 

  1. Secondary Source

Glimpses: A Selection of Published Articles about Stephen Gill and His Books. Cornwall: Vesta (Canada), 1999.

 

 

Professor B.D. Sharma teaches at Hi-Tech Institute of Technology and Engineering in Ghaziabad, UP., India.  He has authored  books of literary criticism and collections of poems.

==============================================================================